Contract analysis · 50k contracts/month
Structured clause extraction with field-level audit. Each clause has an extracted value, a confidence score and the original passage for human validation when needed.
When what your team does involves judgment, classification or interpretation — generative AI changes the game.
We combine LLM + tools + feedback loops. Nothing reaches production without clear metrics.
Classification, extraction and decisions in flows with clear human-fallback rules.
Contracts, invoices, records, proposals. Semantic structuring with field-level audit.
Where traditional RPA broke on variations, generative AI closes the loop with reasoning.
Latency, rework rate, % auto-resolution, cost per document. Visible in real time.
Automation that doesn't break on semantic variation — generative AI handles different documents, rephrased sentences, unforeseen exceptions, while staying auditable.
Multi-source ingestion: email, upload, API, scan OCR.
Output Input pipeline with format validation.
LLM extraction + declared schema per document type.
Output Normalized JSON with per-field confidence.
Rules + model decide auto-approval vs. human review.
Output Confidence threshold calibrated per type.
Every decision has a trail: input, prompt, model, confidence, output. Digitally signed.
Output Audit-ready logs (internal/external).
Structured clause extraction with field-level audit. Each clause has an extracted value, a confidence score and the original passage for human validation when needed.
Automatic cross-checking between invoice, EHR and contractual table. Flags technical denials with rationale, letting the human auditor focus only on edge cases.
Heterogeneous vendor PDFs converted into normalized structured tables. Procurement team stopped copying and pasting and started comparing.
Traditional RPA runs deterministic scripts — when input varies, it breaks. Generative AI handles semantic variation: different documents of the same type, rephrased sentences, unforeseen exceptions. RPA + AI is the common pattern today.
On every deployment we define a gold-set (samples reviewed by domain humans) and run continuous evaluation. Above the agreed threshold, output goes automatic; below, it goes to human review.
Yes. Native APIs (SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, etc.) or webhook for custom systems. Legacy without API: RPA bridge.
We define confidence gates per error type. Expensive errors (e.g., approving an invoice) always pass through a human. Cheap errors (e.g., ticket urgency classification) can go automatic with sample-based audit.